Skip navigation.

Harold's Home

   Home
  
XML version of this site

PHP Scripts

Index
CLI fun
Mail on 404
HB-NS (NewsScript)

Downloads

Applescripts
APOD to Desktop
Dreamweaver Extensions

Stuff

Writings
Other stuff
Central Grinder

OOOk Default:

VJ stuff
VJ Tools
Bananas
Strippers
Sample Movies

News

More on banning women
Right, some additions to the brouhaha of my previous post. The court decision to subsidise a fundamentalist christian party wasn't made by the Hoge Raad (High Council) but by the Raad van State (Council of State). The full decision can now be read (in Dutch) and it clarifies a few things.
http://www.rechtspraak.nl/ljn.asp?ljn=BB9493
Warning! Lots of legalese mumbo-jumbo!

The way I'm reading this is that the SGP got off on minor technicalities that are inherent in the UN decision and the conflict the UN decision has with the freedom to associate and form politial parties or organisations that do restrict membership.

So the Council of State ruled that the freedom to associate is of a higher order than the rights of women to be treated as equals.
Which is good to know I guess. My previous posts conclusions still stands though: it is apparently legal to discriminate as long as others don't do this.

Madness.

Show all items | Read all items

About, copyright, privacy and accessibility | Mail